ziqingluo-90 added inline comments.
================
Comment at:
clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-unsafe-buffer-usage-fixits-multi-parm-span.cpp:37-39
+// CHECK: fix-it:{{.*}}:{[[@LINE+3]]:24-[[@LINE+3]]:30}:"std::span<int> p"
+// CHECK: fix-it:{{.*}}:{[[@LINE+2]]:32-[[@LINE+2]]:39}:"std::span<int *> q"
+// CHECK: fix-it:{{.*}}:{[[@LINE+1]]:41-[[@LINE+1]]:48}:"std::span<int> a"
----------------
NoQ wrote:
> The fix is emitted 3 times right? Once for each warning?
>
> Would it make sense to duplicate the three `CHECK:` lines three times to
> confirm that?
I wish there are better ways to test this. I tried `CHECK-COUNT-3` but it
doesn't work because it expects each line repeats 3 times consecutively.
================
Comment at:
clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-unsafe-buffer-usage-fixits-multi-parm-span.cpp:306
+ b[5] = 5; // expected-note{{used in buffer access here}}
+}
----------------
t-rasmud wrote:
> Can we have a test case with qualifiers on parameters and maybe another with
> a qualifier on the function itself?
good point. I recently added such tests for parameters and local variables in
following open patches:
- https://reviews.llvm.org/D156189 :
clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-unsafe-buffer-usage-fixits-local-var-span.cpp:49--62
- https://reviews.llvm.org/D156188 :
clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-unsafe-buffer-usage-fixits-parm-span.cpp:150--198
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D153059/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D153059
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
