galenelias added a comment. In D150403#4539874 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D150403#4539874>, @owenpan wrote:
> This seems to cause a regression. See > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/64134. @galenelias any idea? I will take a look. The logic I added is trying to distinguish `{ } {` by looking at the token prior to the first l_brace, and checking if it's an identifier to quantify this as a braced list brace. In this case, it's actually a `>`, so the code decides it's a scope brace instead. I could easily patch it to also allow for a `>`, but don't want this to devolve into a long trail of hacks either. Let me think about it a bit more, and I'll come up with a forward fix. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D150403/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D150403 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
