nickdesaulniers added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/JumpDiagnostics.cpp:361
+ if (!GS->isAsmGoto())
+ break;
// Remember both what scope a goto is in as well as the fact that we have
----------------
nickdesaulniers wrote:
> rjmccall wrote:
> > nickdesaulniers wrote:
> > > rjmccall wrote:
> > > > You can pull the `GCCAsmStmtClass` case right above this, make the cast
> > > > unconditional (`if (!cast<GCCAsmStmt>(S)->isAsmGoto()) break;`), and
> > > > then fall through into the GotoStmt case.
> > > I could hoist + use `[[fallthrough]]` but note that the case above
> > > `Stmt::SwitchStmtClass` also currently uses `[[fallthrough]]` here as
> > > well; so I would still need the `dyn_cast`.
> > >
> > > With that in mind, do you still prefer the hoisting? I don't have a
> > > preference, but wanted to triple check that with you.
> > Ah, right. Personally, I would probably put this common path in a helper
> > function, but you could also just duplicate it since it's so small. This
> > also seems like an acceptable use-case for `goto` if you can stomach that —
> > with a good label, it should still be very readable.
> Is https://reviews.llvm.org/D155522 what you had in mind? If so, then I'll
> squash it into this, otherwise can you state differently what you had in mind?
oh, rereading what you wrote, I think I understand what you mean with `goto`s.
Let me post a diff of that, for clarification.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D155342/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D155342
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
