Sedeniono marked 6 inline comments as done.
Sedeniono added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/unittests/Format/FormatTestSelective.cpp:641-646
+  Style = getLLVMStyle();
+  Style.FixNamespaceComments = false;
+  Code = "namespace ns {\n"
+         "#define REF(alias) alias alias_var;\n"
+         "}";
+  EXPECT_EQ(Code, format(Code, 51, 1));
----------------
owenpan wrote:
> Sedeniono wrote:
> > owenpan wrote:
> > > I suppose this would make the purpose of the test more clear. However, 
> > > this new test (in either version) would pass without the patch, so it 
> > > doesn't capture the bug mentioned in D151047#4369742?
> > When I originally submitted the fix for the incorrect selective formatting 
> > and you committed it to the main branch, some clang rename unit tests 
> > failed because they ran into some `assert()` in `LevelIndentTracker` (see 
> > [this post](https://reviews.llvm.org/D151047#4366917)), making a revert 
> > necessary. There was no test in the format Google Tests themselves that 
> > caught that mistake. Hence I added this test. But this also means that this 
> > test passes with and without the current patch. See an [earlier 
> > comment](https://reviews.llvm.org/D151047#4369742) where I describe the 
> > problem in more details.
> > 
> > Note that the change in `LineJoiner::join()` (which triggered the problem) 
> > is no longer in the current version of the patch because of some other 
> > unrelated changes that happened in the main branch since then. Again, 
> > please compare [another earlier 
> > comment](https://reviews.llvm.org/D151047#4396727).
> Then what do you think about changing the test case as suggested?
I now added the hyperlink. Also, added the "format this line only" comment, but 
on the `"}"` line, since that is the line that gets formatted. Also changed the 
length parameter to `format()` from 1 to 0; this never made any sense to me (a 
range of 0 length?), but it is done everywhere else, so whatever. Removing the 
`Style.FixNamespaceComments = false;` line would be wrong because the value is 
`true` for the LLVM style, so I kept it.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151047/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151047

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to