Sedeniono marked 6 inline comments as done. Sedeniono added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/unittests/Format/FormatTestSelective.cpp:641-646 + Style = getLLVMStyle(); + Style.FixNamespaceComments = false; + Code = "namespace ns {\n" + "#define REF(alias) alias alias_var;\n" + "}"; + EXPECT_EQ(Code, format(Code, 51, 1)); ---------------- owenpan wrote: > Sedeniono wrote: > > owenpan wrote: > > > I suppose this would make the purpose of the test more clear. However, > > > this new test (in either version) would pass without the patch, so it > > > doesn't capture the bug mentioned in D151047#4369742? > > When I originally submitted the fix for the incorrect selective formatting > > and you committed it to the main branch, some clang rename unit tests > > failed because they ran into some `assert()` in `LevelIndentTracker` (see > > [this post](https://reviews.llvm.org/D151047#4366917)), making a revert > > necessary. There was no test in the format Google Tests themselves that > > caught that mistake. Hence I added this test. But this also means that this > > test passes with and without the current patch. See an [earlier > > comment](https://reviews.llvm.org/D151047#4369742) where I describe the > > problem in more details. > > > > Note that the change in `LineJoiner::join()` (which triggered the problem) > > is no longer in the current version of the patch because of some other > > unrelated changes that happened in the main branch since then. Again, > > please compare [another earlier > > comment](https://reviews.llvm.org/D151047#4396727). > Then what do you think about changing the test case as suggested? I now added the hyperlink. Also, added the "format this line only" comment, but on the `"}"` line, since that is the line that gets formatted. Also changed the length parameter to `format()` from 1 to 0; this never made any sense to me (a range of 0 length?), but it is done everywhere else, so whatever. Removing the `Style.FixNamespaceComments = false;` line would be wrong because the value is `true` for the LLVM style, so I kept it. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D151047/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D151047 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits