hvdijk added a comment. In D86310#4498551 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D86310#4498551>, @rnk wrote:
> Given that most non-clang frontends want the bug fix (ABI break), who exactly > is asking for this level of IR ABI stability? You were, I thought, or at least that's how I interpreted your earlier comment. :) If we're now all in agreement that that level of ABI stability is not needed, I can update this patch to address the comment that I had left (it should not be limited to 64-bit, it's needed for all X86). I'll probably be able to find time for this in the weekend. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D86310/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D86310 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
