yronglin marked 2 inline comments as done.
yronglin added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp:8901-8914
+  // [P2718R0] Lifetime extension in range-based for loops.
+  //
+  // 6.7.7 [class.temporary] p5:
+  // There are four contexts in which temporaries are destroyed at a different
+  // point than the end of the full-expression.
+  //
+  // 6.7.7 [class.temporary] p6:
----------------
hubert.reinterpretcast wrote:
> yronglin wrote:
> > rsmith wrote:
> > > This isn't the right way to model the behavior here -- the presence or 
> > > absence of an `ExprWithCleanups` is just a convenience to tell consumers 
> > > of the AST whether they should expect to see cleanups later or not, and 
> > > doesn't carry an implication of affecting the actual temporary lifetimes 
> > > and storage durations.
> > > 
> > > The outcome that we should be aiming to reach is that all 
> > > `MaterializeTemporaryExpr`s created as part of processing the 
> > > for-range-initializer are marked as being lifetime-extended by the 
> > > for-range variable. Probably the simplest way to handle that would be to 
> > > track the current enclosing for-range-initializer variable in the 
> > > `ExpressionEvaluationContextRecord`, and whenever a 
> > > `MaterializeTemporaryExpr` is created, if there is a current enclosing 
> > > for-range-initializer, mark that `MaterializeTemporaryExpr` as being 
> > > lifetime-extended by it.
> > Awesome! Thanks a lot for your advice, this is very helpful! I want to take 
> > a longer look at it.
> As mentioned in D139586, `CXXDefaultArgExpr`s may need additional handling. 
> Similarly for `CXXDefaultInitExpr`s.
Thanks for your tips! I have a question that what's the correct way to extent 
the lifetime of `CXXBindTemporaryExpr`? Can I just `materialize` the temporary? 
It may replaced by `MaterializeTemporaryExpr`, and then I can mark it as being 
lifetime-extended by the for-range variable.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D153701/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D153701

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to