scchan added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/docs/AMDGPUSupport.rst:47 + * - ``__amdgcn_feature_<feature-name>__`` + - Defined for each supported target feature. The value is 1 if the feature is enabled and 0 if it is disabled. Allowed feature names are sramecc and xnack. + * - ``__AMDGCN_CUMODE__`` ---------------- This set of feature macros is tricky. A feature macro is defined only when the corresponding target feature has been explicitly specified during compilation; otherwise it's undefined. Users will have to refer to the target feature table to get the semantic of each state. For example, for xnack, undefined=="any", 1 for xnack+, 0 for xnack-. Is there a reason we don't support features other than sramecc and xnack? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D154133/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D154133 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
