RalfJung added a comment. Yeah, agreed. Though I hear that GCC makes similar assumptions, so this should count as something I think. (I don't have a source for this, so it should probably be verified.)
Anyway I don't think LLVM documenting its assumptions should be blocked on changing the C standard. Maybe LLVM should have blocked *making* those assumptions on changing the standard, but that ship has sailed long ago... (I have less of an opinion about clang since I am not involved there.) > I think it makes sense to document this both from the Clang perspective and > from the LLVM perspective, as they're somewhat different. What would be the right place in LLVM to document this? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D86993/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D86993 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
