owenpan added a comment.

In D153745#4448113 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D153745#4448113>, @rymiel wrote:

> It appears other operators aren't affected, after D153641 
> <https://reviews.llvm.org/D153641> I would have not been surprised if && had 
> become unary :)

`&&` doesn't become unary because of `isUnaryOperator` on line 2432 in the 
annotator.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D153745/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D153745

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to