nridge added a comment.
In D153248#4432108 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D153248#4432108>, @hokein wrote:
> The other question might worth thinking, are these cases critical to fix now?
> I'm not sure `this->find()` is a common case (`find();` already works today).
I may have simplified the test case a bit too much; a more representative case
is one where the base class is a template, and the derived class passes its
template parameter to the base:
template <typename T>
struct Waldo {
void find();
};
template <typename T>
using Wally = Waldo<T>;
template <typename T>
struct S : Wally<T> {
void Foo() { this->find(); }
};
In a case like, the base class is a "dependent base", and the `this->` is
required (without it the code doesn't compile, because the compiler only
attempts the first phase of the name lookup on `find`, and that gives no
results).
In any case, the code was reduced from a bug report affecting a real codebase.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D153248/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D153248
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
