shafik added a comment.
In D151634#4383428 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D151634#4383428>, @Endill wrote:
> @shafik Thank you for letting me know! Now I wonder if it was possible to
> realize by myself without prior knowledge of CWG 2536, because I feel like
> some cross-references are missing.
> Can we proceed if I strip CWG 78 out, leaving only CWG 253?
I don't think there was a way to figure this out w/o knowing or luck.
I think just leave out 78 for now.
================
Comment at: clang/test/CXX/drs/dr2xx.cpp:686
+namespace dr253 { // dr253: 3.9
+struct Z {
----------------
Note this was fixed via:
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p0490r0.html
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D151634/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D151634
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
