cor3ntin added a comment. @aaron.ballman this won;t get approve by core un
In D149276#4302700 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D149276#4302700>, @aaron.ballman wrote: > The changes generally LGTM, but: > >> in a way consistent with the proposed resolution to CWG1223. > > What are the chances that CWG changes their mind and picks a different > direction? They were happy with the direction friday when we looked at it ( not the wording though). I think we should go ahead, waiting until after issaquah might be a bit too late (and if we are claiming auto(x) is implemented we should merge that in 17) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D149276/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D149276 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
