ayzhao added a comment. In D150122#4329401 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D150122#4329401>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> I believe we are having another release of Clang 16, but @tstellar can > confirm or deny that. > > AIUI, there were a few issues holding us back from claiming complete support > (added @ayzhao as a reviewer in case he has a different opinion): > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61145 (backported to 16.x) > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62296 (backported to 16.x) > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62266 (not backported) > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61567 (not backported) > > If we backport the two other issues to 16, then I think the changes in this > review are fine. If we don't backport those two, I think we should claim > Clang 17 to be conservative. I started the backporting process for the remaining 2 bugs. I'm doing https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62266 first before doing https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61567 because otherwise there will be a merge issue. Once those two commits are backported then this patch LGTM. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D150122/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D150122 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
