erichkeane added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/utils/TableGen/SveEmitter.cpp:302
       unsigned Shift = llvm::countr_zero(Mask);
+      assert(Shift >= 64 && "Shift is out of encodable range");
       return (V << Shift) & Mask;
----------------
sdesmalen wrote:
> erichkeane wrote:
> > Shouldn't this be: `assert(Shift < 64 &&"...")`?
> > 
> > `expr.shift` (https://eel.is/c++draft/expr.shift) says:
> > ```
> > The operands shall be of integral or unscoped enumeration type and integral 
> > promotions are performed.
> > The type of the result is that of the promoted left operand.
> > The behavior is undefined if the right operand is negative, or greater than 
> > or equal to the width of the promoted left operand.```
> > 
> > uint64 stays as an `unsigned long`, so it is still 64 bits, so the only 
> > invalid value for `Shift` is 64 (though >64 is 'nonsense', but only 
> > impossible because of `llvm::countr_zero`).
> > 
> > One thing to consider: I wonder if we should instead be changing the 
> > 'shift' to be:
> > 
> > `(V << (Shift % 64)) && Mask` ?  It looks like `arm_sve.td` has the 
> > `NoFlags` value as zero, which I think will end up going through here 
> > possibly (or at least, inserted into `FlagTypes`.
> > 
> > So I suspect an assert might not be sufficient, since a 64 bit shift is 
> > possible in that case (since a zero 'Mask' is the only case where 
> > `countr_zero` will end up being 64).
> > 
> > 
> > So I suspect an assert might not be sufficient, since a 64 bit shift is 
> > possible in that case (since a zero 'Mask' is the only case where 
> > countr_zero will end up being 64).
> It should be fine to assert that `Mask != 0`, since that would be an invalid 
> mask.
Thanks for the comment @sdesmalen!  Is there something that prevents the 
`NoFlags` from being passed as the `MaskName` here?  


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D150140/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D150140

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to