scott.linder added a comment. In D149193#4300885 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D149193#4300885>, @MaskRay wrote:
> I think the patch as-is implements all the useful parts of GCC's complex > rules and in the absence of `-dumpbase` (we deliberately don't implement), > the rule almost exactly matches GCC unless we do `gcc -g -gsplit-dwarf d/a.c > -o e/a.out` (instead of other filenames). > > https://maskray.me/blog/2023-04-25-compiler-output-files records all my > findings. I agree that the special-casing of `a.out` when explicitly specified is odd. Another option to avoid any confusion or debates over exact behavior relative to GCC would be to just make our own option. Rather than add `-dumpdir` we could add `-dump-prefix` or something. I'm also OK with just implementing a simpler subset of the GCC options though (i.e. what you have already). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D149193/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D149193 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
