sberg added a comment. > But the fact that these two attributes already confuse users (AND we've got > unused as an attribute in the mix as well, which doesn't help) means we > should proceed with caution (and likely coordinate with GCC given that all > three of these attributes came from their implementation).
I've brought this up at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2023-April/241205.html "GCC/Clang attributes guiding warnings about unused entities" now. (I tried to cross-post that also to the Clang Frontend discourse category, but that probably didn't work.) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D148505/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D148505 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
