mstorsjo added a comment. In D149119#4298024 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D149119#4298024>, @phosek wrote:
> Supporting only a single tool and simplifying the script would be my > preference as well. I see that the script already supports `llvm-readobj`, do > we need the `llvm-nm` support in that case? I remember seeing it mentioned somewhere (I don't immediately see where right now though), `llvm-readobj` only handles regular object files, while `llvm-nm` handles bitcode too. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D149119/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D149119 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
