scott.linder accepted this revision. scott.linder added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM, thank you! Does this warrant a release note, as it is changing the behavior in a backwards-incompatible manner? I do think changing to match GCC is worthwhile, even if it means a change in behavior for Clang. I also don't think the "longest first" heuristic is useful enough to outweigh the benefits of behaving like GCC; it seems like the user can always sort their own options to get the same effect. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D148975/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D148975 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
