jhuber6 added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/llvmlibc/inline-function-decl.hpp:64-67 +// CHECK-MESSAGES-NOT: :[[@LINE+4]]:3: warning: '__invoke' must be tagged with the LIBC_INLINE macro; the macro should be placed at the beginning of the declaration [llvmlibc-inline-function-decl] +// CHECK-MESSAGES-NOT: :[[@LINE+3]]:3: warning: 'operator void (*)()' must be tagged with the LIBC_INLINE macro; the macro should be placed at the beginning of the declaration [llvmlibc-inline-function-decl] +// CHECK-MESSAGES-NOT: :[[@LINE+2]]:3: warning: '~(lambda at [[FILENAME:.+]])' must be tagged with the LIBC_INLINE macro; the macro should be placed at the beginning of the declaration [llvmlibc-inline-function-decl] +// CHECK-MESSAGES-NOT: :[[@LINE+1]]:6: warning: 'operator()' must be tagged with the LIBC_INLINE macro; the macro should be placed at the beginning of the declaration [llvmlibc-inline-function-decl] ---------------- carlosgalvezp wrote: > Not needed, simply write a plain comment explaining why the check should not > warn here. Since I've already written it I think we should be able to keep it. If really you don't like the extra check lines I can remove them. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D148444/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D148444 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
