Endill added a comment. In D148260#4266802 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D148260#4266802>, @shafik wrote:
> The defect report has two examples even though the first one is commented > incorrectly considering the final resolution. I am sure they are covered in > the test suite in other places but why not add them? My understanding of this CWG is the following. There was redundant wording. Then someone came up with wording that fixes that. Then it was identified that proposed wording is defective, and gives couple of examples, which was enough to return issue to "drafting". What I find important here is that no behavioral changes were introduced. Those examples just give a hint what a //conformance// test for those paragraphs should take into account. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D148260/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D148260 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
