jmorse added a comment. Many thanks for all the feedback,
In D146987#4263139 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D146987#4263139>, @aeubanks wrote: > I'm seeing > > llc: ../../llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp:6214: void > llvm::SelectionDAGBuilder::visitIntrinsicCall(const CallInst &, unsigned > int): Assertion `AssignmentTrackingEnabled && "expected assignment tracking > to be enabled"' failed. > > > with this patch on the following IR (just run `llc` on it) > F27123156: b.ll.txt <https://reviews.llvm.org/F27123156> Hmmmm, that feels like a legitimate IR input where the configuration of debug-info / intrinsics is just unexpected -- we probably shouldn't assert in that situation but gracefully degrade to interpreting a dbg.assign as a dbg.value. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D146987/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D146987 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
