njames93 added a comment.

Have you thought of the possibility of handling this case

  takeOptionalValue(std::move(*param));



================
Comment at: 
clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone/optional-value-conversion.rst:34
+Value extraction using ``operator *`` is matched by default.
+Check does not provide auto-fixes.
+
----------------
Any reason for this limitation, given in most cases the fix is to just remove 
the `*` or `.value()` call


================
Comment at: 
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/bugprone/optional-value-conversion.cpp:16
+  };
+}
+
----------------
It'd be good to have tests demonstating `boost::optional` and `absl::optional` 
as well as the (non standard) get accessor


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D147357/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D147357

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to