royjacobson added a comment. In D147655#4250056 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D147655#4250056>, @rsmith wrote:
> There has not been any stable ABI from any compiler targeting the Itanium C++ > ABI for constrained templates prior to this change. I don't think we need to > worry too much about people using unfinished compiler features being broken > when those features are finished. The ABI has been stable for quite some time and people have been using concepts with it for almost 3 years now. I'm not sure we can still break ABI this easily. But then, I also have no data to say we can't. > The ABI proposals haven't been accepted yet; I'm not intending to land this > change until the proposals have reached consensus in the Itanium C++ ABI > group. Thanks for clarifying! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D147655/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D147655 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
