aprantl added a comment. > We don't want to have one attribute per debug format, because that's not > going to scale.
LLVM supports outputting a total of 2 debug info formats. > So how do we validate that this attribute should be exposed to users *now* > before we know what the story is for other debug formats? Do you have any other debug info formats in mind? To my knowledge LLVM doesn't support lowering all of the the debug info metadata into PDB because there are some corners where it is less expressive than DWARF. I believe that the closest equivalent to this feature in PDB is a feature called "just my code". A web search came up with https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/debugger/just-my-code?view=vs-2022 and it seems like it's powered by an external database of function names. Would be interesting to hear from someone with knowledge and an interest in PDB about this. Would you say that we shouldn't create this attribute if it cannot be supported on Windows? Or would documenting that the attribute only has an effect on DWARF platforms be sufficient? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D146595/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D146595 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
