schittir added a comment. In D146847#4220697 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D146847#4220697>, @jrtc27 wrote:
> None of the other fields are initialised, so blindly initialising it alone to > 0 here seems highly suspect. What's the actual case in which it's used whilst > uninitialised? Coverity complains about SR.PolicyBitMask being uninitialized when calling SemaRecords->push_back(SR) CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D146847/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D146847 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
