mboehme marked an inline comment as done. mboehme added a comment. In D146514#4213302 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D146514#4213302>, @xazax.hun wrote:
> In D146514#4212528 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D146514#4212528>, @mboehme wrote: > >> No, I think this is a different case. > > Sorry, I might have been unclear. I 100% agree that these are different > cases. I was wondering whether we can/should have a single code path > supporting both. But I do not insist since we do not seem to have precedent > for the scenario I mentioned and do not want to block anything based on > hypotheticals. Got it, thanks! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D146514/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D146514 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
