Krishna-13-cyber created this revision.
Krishna-13-cyber added reviewers: tbaeder, cjdb.
Herald added a project: All.
Krishna-13-cyber requested review of this revision.
Herald added a project: clang.
Herald added a subscriber: cfe-commits.

There are some simple messages where an expansion isn't particularly helpful or 
needed. We aim to eliminate expansions that don't add much value for user (this 
will give us slightly more room or prioritise to have longer diagnostics 
elsewhere).

The test case for which it has been tested:

  constexpr auto is_gitlab = false;
  constexpr auto is_weekend = false;
  static_assert(is_gitlab or is_weekend);

**Previous warning/error message**:

  <source>:4:1: error: static assertion failed due to requirement 'is_gitlab || 
is_weekend'
  static_assert(is_gitlab or is_weekend);
  ^             ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  <source>:4:25: note: expression evaluates to 'false || false'
  static_assert(is_gitlab or is_weekend);
                ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~

**Currrent warning/error message**:

  <source>:4:1: error: static assertion failed due to requirement 'is_gitlab'
  static_assert(is_gitlab and is_weekend);
  ^             ~~~~~~~~~


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

https://reviews.llvm.org/D146376

Files:
  clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp


Index: clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
+++ clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
@@ -16744,9 +16744,7 @@
           DiagSide[I].Result.Val, Side->getType(), DiagSide[I].ValueString);
     }
     if (DiagSide[0].Print && DiagSide[1].Print) {
-      Diag(Op->getExprLoc(), diag::note_expr_evaluates_to)
-          << DiagSide[0].ValueString << Op->getOpcodeStr()
-          << DiagSide[1].ValueString << Op->getSourceRange();
+      return;
     }
   }
 }


Index: clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
+++ clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
@@ -16744,9 +16744,7 @@
           DiagSide[I].Result.Val, Side->getType(), DiagSide[I].ValueString);
     }
     if (DiagSide[0].Print && DiagSide[1].Print) {
-      Diag(Op->getExprLoc(), diag::note_expr_evaluates_to)
-          << DiagSide[0].ValueString << Op->getOpcodeStr()
-          << DiagSide[1].ValueString << Op->getSourceRange();
+      return;
     }
   }
 }
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to