donat.nagy added a comment. @vabridgers Thanks for testing these commits!
As @balazske wrote on D144622 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D144622>, I'd suggest handling the three commits (this one = D140562 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D140562>, D144622 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D144622> and D144273 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D144273>) separately, because they are fixing analogous, but independent problems. (They affect separate branches of the import process and as far as I see they do not influence each other.) As this commit seems to be ready, I'd suggest merging this now (while we wait for improvements on the other two). @vabridgers What do you think about this plan? Do you see any dependency between the three commits that would make merging just one of them problematic? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D140562/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D140562 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
