aaron.ballman added a comment. In D144572#4145634 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D144572#4145634>, @royjacobson wrote:
> In D144572#4145614 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D144572#4145614>, @cor3ntin > wrote: > >> @aaron.ballman is the plan to backport that to clang 16? I think it probably >> should. >> We ought to try to improve the situation for clang 17 > > cxx_status.html is always updated from trunk, no? I don't think we need to > bother with backporting if that's the case Correct, that only reflects what's happening on trunk, so the only thing we could backport from this is the extra test coverage (doesn't seem worth porting, IMO). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D144572/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D144572 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
