jmmartinez added a comment.
I've added just a few minor remarks.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfCompileUnit.cpp:1082-1084
+ if (!includeMinimalInlineScopes() && !Scope->getInlinedAt())
+ for (const auto *Decl : DD->getLocalDeclsForScope(Scope->getScopeNode()))
+ DeferredLocalDecls.insert(Decl);
----------------
NIT: You could avoid writing the for loop
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfCompileUnit.cpp:1646-1649
+ if (LexicalBlockDIEs.count(LB))
+ return LexicalBlockDIEs[LB];
+
+ return nullptr;
----------------
Nit: `lookup` returns the value in the map or returns a default value.
================
Comment at: llvm/test/DebugInfo/Generic/split-dwarf-local-import3.ll:17-36
+; CHECK: DW_TAG_subprogram
+; CHECK: DW_AT_name ("foo")
+; CHECK: DW_TAG_imported_declaration
+; CHECK: NULL
+
+; CHECK: DW_TAG_base_type
+; CHECK: DW_AT_name ("int")
----------------
I'd be tempted to match the offset of the abstract subprogram and of the
imported declaration too.
At least for me, it makes clear the intention of the test without running it.
What do you think ?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D144004/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D144004
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
