Michael137 added a comment. In D144181#4133025 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D144181#4133025>, @dblaikie wrote:
> Ah, accidentally posted to the lldb part of this stack... instead: > > Any chance we can make these work more like member functions (could the ctors > include their mangled names, for instance)? Or is it the innate nature of > ctors having the various C1 <https://reviews.llvm.org/C1>/C2/etc versions? Initially we tried that in https://reviews.llvm.org/D143652. The existence of multiple constructor definitions which aren't linked to the `DISubprogram` declaration makes it tough. We need to start with a pretty expensive search through the index for all the possible definitions. But then we need to somehow choose the right one to take the linkage name from. And that context isn't available at the point where LLDB parses DWARF. I'll post some numbers of how much space this would take with Adrian's suggestion and go from there Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D144181/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D144181 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
