rampitec added a comment. In D142507#4127505 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D142507#4127505>, @b-sumner wrote:
>> My current understanding is the c-p will go into already forked clang-16, >> but not to rocm 5.4. So rocm device-libs will be accompanied by the older >> clang-16 w/o this and stay compatible. Someone building from scratch will >> use latest clang-16 and staging device-libs with this change. Do you think >> this will work? > > I wouldn't recommend it. I would patch whatever device libs are being built > in association with clang-16, not staging. Staging device libs is only > appropriate for the staging compiler. A hash of device libs from around the > time that clang-16 stable released would probably be safe. In general the idea is that compiler and device-libs should match. I guess the correct answer then users of clang-16 shall use rocm-5.4.x branch of the device libs? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D142507/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D142507 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
