craig.topper added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/AST/Type.h:7209
+inline bool Type::isVectorFloat32Type() const {
+#define RVV_TYPE(Name, Id, SingletonId) false ||
----------------
This function is RVV specific so it's name is misleading. It's also identical
to the isRVVFloat32Type function
================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/TargetInfo.h:668
+ /// Determine whether vector int64 type is supported on this target.
+ virtual bool hasVectorInt64Support() const { return false; }
+
----------------
Having a different virtual method for each type doesn't scale well. Could we
have a single function that take the bitwidth and a bool for int or FP?
It's also very misleading based on the current names to return false for
targets like X86 that do support float32 and float64.
Overall it might be cleaner to call S.Context.getTargetInfo().hasFeature( from
RISCV-V specific code in Sema instead of trying to define a generic interface.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D143665/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D143665
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
