aaron.ballman accepted this revision.
aaron.ballman added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM, but I am also not well-versed in vector operations, so you may want to
wait a day or two for @uweigand or someone else to sign off as well.
================
Comment at: llvm/tools/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp:8681-8683
@@ -8680,5 +8676,3 @@
}
- return CheckVectorOperands(LHS, RHS, Loc, IsCompAssign,
- /*AllowBothBool*/true,
- /*AllowBoolConversions*/false);
}
----------------
vbyakovl wrote:
> aaron.ballman wrote:
> > Are you saying that calling `CheckVectorOperands` was always incorrect? Or
> > that it's no longer required because it should be fully covered by
> > `checkVectorShift`? Because the two methods do considerably different
> > checking, and I would have expected there to be more behavioral differences
> > in the tests by removing the call to `CheckVectorOperands` that suggests
> > there are tests missing.
> Yes, calling CheckVectorOperands is not correct here because it compares
> operand types to be the same. For shift it is not true.
Thank you for clarifying!
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D21678
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
