tbaeder added a comment. In D141472#4091662 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D141472#4091662>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> Design question -- do you anticipate this class handling *all* function > pointers, including pointer to member functions that might be virtual: > https://godbolt.org/z/hT8fMY37n I had to make a few adjustments but I have that example working locally now, of course no idea if that would work generally. Do you see any problem with the proposed `FunctionPointer` class? According to https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ConstantInterpreter.html#pointers, there was a `MemberPointer` class that sounds related to this, but I don't know more about it. I guess, since you made `func()` virtual, that matters and becomes a bytecode-runtime decision instead of being known at compile-time, which seems to be the case in your example? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D141472/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D141472 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
