kadircet added a comment. And to follow up, I definitely see the problem you're facing and it's something we'd like to address as well, just not in the way you proposed.
This falls under the bucket of "we might have symbols missing from our stdlib mappings and should try to compensate for that", e.g. we should probably try disabling include-insertion for such cases where we have a high confidence that the symbol is part of stdlib but we don't have an exact mapping in our symbol database to remedy the issue around inserting "wrong" includes. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D142836/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D142836 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
