owenpan added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp:3592-3601
     case tok::kw_bool:
       // bool is only allowed if it is directly followed by a paren for a cast:
       // concept C = bool(...);
       // and bool is the only type, all other types as cast must be inside a
       // cast to bool an thus are handled by the other cases.
       if (Tokens->peekNextToken()->isNot(tok::l_paren))
         return;
----------------
HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
> MyDeveloperDay wrote:
> > rymiel wrote:
> > > owenpan wrote:
> > > > rymiel wrote:
> > > > > rymiel wrote:
> > > > > > owenpan wrote:
> > > > > > > We should pass `true` to `peekNextToken()` on Line 3597 here, but 
> > > > > > > removing this entire case would have no effect on the existing 
> > > > > > > unit test (Line 23693 in FormatTest.cpp). @HazardyKnusperkeks any 
> > > > > > > idea?
> > > > > > The peeking is there because of https://reviews.llvm.org/D134325, 
> > > > > > it has no format tests, only an annotator test
> > > > > Also, I don't think that function is involved in concept declarations 
> > > > > since https://reviews.llvm.org/D140339
> > > > So which tests were meant to check the `kw_bool` case here?
> > > Well, originally the one you mentioned on line 23693, but since the code 
> > > paths have been changed, I think it's really only the one added in 
> > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D134325
> > I love the new annotator tests, but we should probably always try to add a 
> > verifyFormat test as well even if its trivial in the future, just so we 
> > have some context as to what type of code warranted the change.
> As far as I can see it does not only can be removed, it should be removed.
> 
> `bool` can not appear on the top level of a requires clause. As @rymiel said 
> it is there for the concepts, which are now handled differently.
@rymiel @HazardyKnusperkeks thanks for the explanations. Can we remove the 
`kw_bool` case then?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D142412/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D142412

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to