owenpan added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp:3592-3601 case tok::kw_bool: // bool is only allowed if it is directly followed by a paren for a cast: // concept C = bool(...); // and bool is the only type, all other types as cast must be inside a // cast to bool an thus are handled by the other cases. if (Tokens->peekNextToken()->isNot(tok::l_paren)) return; ---------------- HazardyKnusperkeks wrote: > MyDeveloperDay wrote: > > rymiel wrote: > > > owenpan wrote: > > > > rymiel wrote: > > > > > rymiel wrote: > > > > > > owenpan wrote: > > > > > > > We should pass `true` to `peekNextToken()` on Line 3597 here, but > > > > > > > removing this entire case would have no effect on the existing > > > > > > > unit test (Line 23693 in FormatTest.cpp). @HazardyKnusperkeks any > > > > > > > idea? > > > > > > The peeking is there because of https://reviews.llvm.org/D134325, > > > > > > it has no format tests, only an annotator test > > > > > Also, I don't think that function is involved in concept declarations > > > > > since https://reviews.llvm.org/D140339 > > > > So which tests were meant to check the `kw_bool` case here? > > > Well, originally the one you mentioned on line 23693, but since the code > > > paths have been changed, I think it's really only the one added in > > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D134325 > > I love the new annotator tests, but we should probably always try to add a > > verifyFormat test as well even if its trivial in the future, just so we > > have some context as to what type of code warranted the change. > As far as I can see it does not only can be removed, it should be removed. > > `bool` can not appear on the top level of a requires clause. As @rymiel said > it is there for the concepts, which are now handled differently. @rymiel @HazardyKnusperkeks thanks for the explanations. Can we remove the `kw_bool` case then? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D142412/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D142412 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits