jrtc27 added a comment. How does this affect LTO? LTO for RISC-V is broken for various reasons, but LTO isn't Clang's responsibility beyond passing on driver arguments. Is this not just one of many symptoms of RISC-V not having the right module-level subtarget under LTO, which is a real problem that needs fixing?
Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D139704/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D139704 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
