lebedev.ri added a comment. In D142123#4066351 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D142123#4066351>, @njames93 wrote:
> Given the fact its non-standard, it has caveats and peoples eagerness to > blindly enable all checks (or all checks from a module). > I feel this check would likely cause more harm than good. Shall we remove abseil checks? Shall we remove libc++-specific checks? Shall we remove webkit checks? Shall we remove backwards-compatibility checks? Nothing is ever useful for everyone. Much like `-Weverything`, enabling all checks comes with an explcit caveat that one needs to disable the checks that are not applicable for the codebase. +1 to having this check. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D142123/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D142123 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
