v.g.vassilev added a comment. In D131858#4058807 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D131858#4058807>, @erichkeane wrote:
> In D131858#4054348 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D131858#4054348>, @v.g.vassilev > wrote: > >> In D131858#4052031 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D131858#4052031>, @erichkeane >> wrote: >> >>> In D131858#4052026 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D131858#4052026>, >>> @v.g.vassilev wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks a lot @rsmith for providing a fix and thanks a lot @aaron.ballman >>>> and @erichkeane for the efforts saving @mizvekov work over the summer. I >>>> believe he has sporadic access to internet and soon he will be back to >>>> normal. Great example of team work here!! >>> >>> Note we don't yet have the evidence that this is savable yet, we should >>> know in the next day or so. At minimum, at least 1 of his patches needs to >>> be reverted due to the memory regression. >> >> I see that https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/job/clang-stage2-Rthinlto/6584/ >> picked up your revert and seems successful. Then the next build is green as >> well and then starts failing for a reason that’s unrelated to this patch. > > Yep! So only 1 of the patches (D136566 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D136566> > needs reverting/further attention). Awesome!! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D131858/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D131858 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
