v1nh1shungry added inline comments.
================
Comment at:
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/modernize/concat-nested-namespaces.cpp:173
+namespace n48 {
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-DAG: :[[@LINE-2]]:1: warning: nested namespaces can be
concatenated [modernize-concat-nested-namespaces]
+// CHECK-FIXES: namespace n47::n48
----------------
njames93 wrote:
> Is `CHECK-MESSAGES-DAG` needed here, why does it fail if this is omitted?
Hmm, doesn't `CHECK-MESSAGES-DAG` means to check whether there is a message? (I
referred to the tests above.)
If it's other cases, maybe it's due to
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/60051.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean, sorry!
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D141787/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D141787
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
