HazardyKnusperkeks added a comment. In D141654#4053470 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D141654#4053470>, @rymiel wrote:
> This also made me wonder, is there an actual policy on deprecated options? As > in, when they are actually removed. Is there even prior precedent for doing > this? (I wouldn't know because I'm a very recent user) I think the first one was D108752 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D108752> and the documentation can handle that since D127578 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D127578>. Removing an option is not different than changing the type of an option, users of `libformat` have to adapt, and users of `clang-format` don't notice (if everything is done right), because the parsing for the removed options is still there, see lines 1068 and following of `Format.cpp` in this change. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D141654/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D141654 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
