v1nh1shungry added a comment. > The rule does not complain.
Sorry, I'm confused. Could you please explain what you expect this example should achieve and what is "the rule"? Thanks! > So I think that the "resolved" type (size_t) should be use instead of the > templated one (std::vector<int, std::allocator<int>>::size_type). Note: the "desugared type" I mention is the **FULLY** desugared type, so it will achieve `unsigned long` instead of `size_t`. There is a method `QualType::getSingleStepDesugaredType()` which may get `size_t`, but I haven't had a try. But even though it works, this will still turn `int64_t` into `long`. BTW, if you think the desugared type is better, which do you think is better, to get single step desugared or to get fully desugared? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D141058/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D141058 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
