isuckatcs added a comment. > the temporary's construction should appear before, but the binding decls, > which use the synthetic variables, should appear after
I'm confused a bit here. Right now the CFG looks like this: <constructor_call> <binding_decl_0> ... <binding_decl_n> Based on what you say I assume you want something to happen between `constructor_call` and `binding_decl_0`. Could you visualize somehow how you think the ideal CFG here looks like? > What do you think of duplicating it in the CFG, possibly with a new > (statement) element kind (to mark it as a special)? > There are other workarounds that we could do on our end, but the duplication > would avoid the need for such -- for us and any other clients. Well, I don't think duplicating a statement in the CFG is a good idea as long as there are other solutions for this problem. This seems to be a very specific problem, so I think a local solution should be pursued instead if possible. What do you think @xazax.hun @NoQ ? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D139544/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D139544 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
