tahonermann added a comment.
Here is a simple test case that fails the assertion in the current location.
struct B {
B(int, int);
};
struct D : B {
D() : B(0, 1) {}
};
I spent a bit more time looking at the code and finally realized that
`Initializer` is only assigned when `Args.size()` is exactly 1. So
`Initializer` doesn't equate to whether or not an initializer is present; it
equates to when exactly one initialization argument is present and in that case
it aliases `Args[0]`. I don't like that, but deviating from it just to address
a Coverity complaint doesn't seem justified.
I suggest we do this: add an assertion on `Initializer` at the beginning of
each of the blocks that Coverity complained about. In my view of the source,
that corresponds to lines 5939, 5958, and 6025.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D139148/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D139148
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
