ayzhao added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/CXX/class/class.compare/class.spaceship/p1.cpp:106
Cmp<G2>() <=> Cmp<G2>(), // expected-note-re {{in defaulted three-way
comparison operator for '{{.*}}Cmp<{{.*}}G2>' first required here}}j
- // expected-error@#cmp {{no matching conversion for static_cast from
'void' to 'std::strong_ordering'}}
+ // expected-error@#cmp {{static_cast from 'void' to
'std::strong_ordering' is not allowed}}
Cmp<H>() <=> Cmp<H>(), // expected-note-re {{in defaulted three-way
comparison operator for '{{.*}}Cmp<{{.*}}H>' first required here}}j
----------------
ilya-biryukov wrote:
> Do you have any idea why did this diagnostic change?
Fixed - I needed to add a line to `SemaCast.cpp`
================
Comment at: clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.decls/temp.variadic/p4.cpp:131
+// pre20-error@-2 {{no matching constructor for initialization of 'B'}}
+// post20-error@-3 {{excess elements in struct initializer}}
+// post20-error@-4 {{excess elements in struct initializer}}
----------------
ilya-biryukov wrote:
> Given how pervasive this error is right now, I feel that we want to add a
> name of the struct to this message.
> This case is also a good example of how this diagnostic can be really low
> quality with templates: it's unclear which exact base class causes a problem
> here from the compiler output,.
>
> Maybe open a GH issue for that? It seems like an independent task that will
> also affect braced initializers and may need test file updates.
Created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59367
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D129531/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D129531
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
