shafik added a comment. In D139429#3974491 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D139429#3974491>, @cor3ntin wrote:
> I'm not sure how I feel about this. > Clang does not, implement correctly that paragraph at all, so I think the > best course here is to create an issue on the llvm github and mark the dr > resolved as part of fixing the bug in clang. > The fact the previous wording was unclear may be related to clamg > non-conformance. I agree, I don't believe we are conforming and there should be a bug report. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D139429/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D139429 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
