kadircet marked 5 inline comments as done.
kadircet added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/include-cleaner/test/html.cpp:7
int n = foo();
+// CHECK: Symbol{{.*}}foo
+// CHECK-NEXT: int foo()
----------------
sammccall wrote:
> I'd like to keep a very simple smoke test of the HTML report.
>
> If you're aiming to test something specific here about the HTML report, I'd
> suggest creating a new test describing what it is. (Though generally
> speaking, the HTML test has poor test coverage of its details, which I think
> is unfortunately the right tradeoff)
>
> If you're aiming to provide an integration test (these locations are taken
> into account in making overall decisions), I think this should be a test
> using `-print=changes` rather than -html.
thanks makes sense. `print-changes` didn't exist back in the day when i was
putting together this patch and i forgot to update this piece.
i wasn't trying to test HTMLReport behaviour specifically, and it's probably
not worth adding that anyways.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D138200/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D138200
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
