efriedma added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDeclCXX.cpp:572
PrioritizedCXXGlobalInits.push_back(std::make_pair(Key, Fn));
+ } else if (D->hasConstantInitialization() && !(D->hasAttr<ConstInitAttr>()))
{
+ OrderGlobalInitsOrStermFinalizers Key(201,
----------------
zahiraam wrote:
> efriedma wrote:
> > How is ConstInitAttr relevant here?
> This change made (without the !(D->hasAttr<ConstInitAttr>()) made the LIT
> behavior of aix-static-init.cpp. The IR generated for
> namespace test3 {
> struct Test3 {
> constexpr Test3() {};
> ~Test3() {};
> };
>
> constinit Test3 t;
> } // namespace test3
>
> was different. I would have thought that the change we made for constexpr
> wouldn't affter constinit?
I think the significant bit there isn't the use of constinit; it's the
non-trivial destructor. I think the priority modification should only affect
constructors, not destructors. (Not sure how to make that work, at first
glance.)
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D137107/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D137107
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
