Endill added a subscriber: aaron.ballman.
Endill added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/CXX/drs/dr6xx.cpp:18
+ sp->f(2);
+ sp->f(2.2); // expected-error {{is a private member}}
+}
----------------
Endill wrote:
> shafik wrote:
> > Maybe add a comment above this saying something like:
> >
> > ```
> > // access control is applied after overload resolution
> > // [class.access.general]p4 "For an overload set, access control is applied
> > only to the function selected by overload resolution."
> > ```
> I tend to like the idea, but I wonder about general rule for adding such
> explanations. Currently DR tests contain very little of those.
>
> If we're going to add explanations, we should also decide whether we're going
> to cite the standard, or paraphrase (and/or) explain intent. My concern is
> that both references to standard and citations could grow old relatively
> quickly, and we don't have any tools to help, at least yet.
@aaron.ballman What do you think?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D139173/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D139173
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
